🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," stated one MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies take a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of the Australian government and others demonstrate that governments globally are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.